Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 448/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:448A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for ineffective judicial protection due to failure to invoke right.

Case Number AUTO 448/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to invoke the right to effective judicial protection in the initial demand. Although the applicant argued that the trial court's evidentiary activities violated the presumption of innocence under Article 24.2 of the Constitution, the Court found the specific constitutional claim absent from the original complaint. Consequently, the remedy was rejected as the necessary procedural prerequisite for invoking this fundamental right was not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.2 C.E.; Art. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.: The right to effective judicial protection is not invoked if the specific constitutional claim is omitted in the initial demand, rendering the subsequent appeal inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection presumption of innocence inadmissible appeal procedural requirement constitutional claim omission

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.2 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.2 C.E.
Art. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1630-1987

Fecha de resolución

18/04/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.630/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Derecho a la presunción de inocencia: actividad probatoria. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: derecho no invocado. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Sixto Arturo Casabona Martínez interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sección Segunda de la Audiencia Provincial de Valencia, que, en apelación, revoca la dictada por el Juzgado de Instrucción de Alcira y condena por delito contra la

seguridad del tráfico. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.2 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00448-1987_01630.pdf