Constitutional Court dismisses amparo claim for Article 25.1 CE violation in homicide conviction due to lack of procedural content.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the amparo remedy filed by Mr. Bote Gutiérrez against his homicide convictions. The applicant argued that the proceedings violated his right to a fair trial under Article 25.1 of the Constitution, but the Court found the complaint lacked the necessary procedural substance required for admissibility. Consequently, the claim was rejected because it did not demonstrate a concrete violation of the constitutional right in question.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 25.1 C.E.; Art. 54.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court declares an amparo remedy inadmissible when the applicant fails to substantiate the alleged violation of the constitutional right with specific procedural facts.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Primera
Magistrados
Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Eugenio Díaz Eimil.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 1624-1987
Fecha de resolución
18/04/1988
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.624/1987
Resumen
Inadmisión. Principio de legalidad penal: no violado. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
Don José Manuel Bote Gutiérrez interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sección Segunda de la Audiencia Provincial de Bilbao, condenatoria por delito de homicidio, y de la Sala Segunda del Tribunal Supremo, confirmatoria en casación. Invoca la
vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 25.1 C.E.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00447-1987_01624.pdf