Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 439/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:439A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to procedural expiration and failure to provide a copy of the contested resolution.

Case Number AUTO 439/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the constitutional appeal filed by Don Jerónimo Roca Ros against a lower court ruling on rent consignation. The applicant invoked Article 24.2 of the Constitution, but the court found the action time-barred and noted the absence of a copy of the contested resolution. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because procedural requirements for admissibility were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.2 C.E.; Art. 40.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court lacks jurisdiction to examine constitutional complaints that are time-barred or where the applicant fails to provide a copy of the contested resolution.

Keywords

AI generated
constitutional appeal admissibility procedural time bar lack of resolution copy Article 24.2 Constitution jurisdictional requirements

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.2 C.E.
los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.2 C.E.
Art. 40.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1555-1987

Fecha de resolución

18/04/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.555/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: caducidad de la acción. Copia de la resolución recaída: falta.

Don Jerónimo Roca Ros interpone recurso de amparo contra Auto de la Sección Segunda de la Audiencia Provincial de Murcia que confirma el del Juzgado de Distrito núm. 2 de Cartagena, en expediente sobre consignación de rentas. Invoca la vulneración de

los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.2 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers