Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 437/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:437A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal as effective judicial protection right was not violated.

Case Number AUTO 437/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by A.M.P. Española against a Supreme Court ruling that rejected a customs arbitration board decision. The company argued this violated Article 24 of the Constitution regarding effective judicial protection, but the Court found no violation. The Court determined the right to effective protection was not infringed because the domestic judicial process provided adequate remedies.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 C.E.; The right to effective judicial protection is not violated when the domestic legal system offers sufficient procedural avenues for the resolution of disputes, even if the final outcome is unfavorable to the appellant.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection Article 24 Constitution customs arbitration administrative liquidations constitutional appeal inadmissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en art. 24 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Eugenio Díaz Eimil.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1550-1987

Fecha de resolución

18/04/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.550/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: derecho no violado. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

«A. M. P. Española, S. A.», interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Tercera del Tribunal Supremo, que desestima recurso contra fallo de la Junta Arbitral de Aduanas de Barcelona en relación con liquidaciones giradas por importaciones de

material eléctrico. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en art. 24 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00437-1987_01550.pdf