Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 417/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:417A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to contradictory judicial resolutions violating effective judicial protection rights.

Case Number AUTO 417/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible after finding contradictory judicial resolutions regarding a collection bonus claim. The applicants argued that these conflicting rulings violated their rights to equality and effective judicial protection under Articles 14, 24.1, and 9.3 of the Constitution. The Court ruled that the existence of contradictory judgments itself constituted a lack of effective judicial protection, rendering the appeal procedurally unfounded.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Articles 14, 24.1, and 9.3 of the Constitution: Contradictory judicial resolutions constitute a violation of the effective judicial protection of judges and courts, leading to the inadmissibility of the appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection contradictory judgments principle of equality judicial protection of judges inadmissibility of appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 14 of the Constitution
los derechos consagrados en los arts. 14, 24.1 y 9.3 C.E.
Article 24.1 of the Constitution
Article 9.3 of the Constitution

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1216-1987

Fecha de resolución

18/04/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.216/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Principio de igualdad: igualdad en la aplicación de la Ley. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: resoluciones judiciales contradictorias. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Luis Hernández Hernández y otros interponen recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del TCT que revoca la dictada por la Magistratura de Trabajo de Salamanca, en autos sobre reclamación de cantidad derivada del premio de cobranza. Invoca la vulneración de

los derechos consagrados en los arts. 14, 24.1 y 9.3 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00417-1987_01216.pdf