Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 406/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:406A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal regarding professional fees for lawyers in incidental constitutional proceedings.

Case Number AUTO 406/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the claim for professional fees inadmissible, ruling that such costs are not covered by the state budget for constitutional appeals. The applicants, a lawyer and a company, sought reimbursement for expenses incurred during the incidental procedure derived from their amparo against a criminal conviction. The court held that since these fees are not part of the state's constitutional appeal budget, the claim must be rejected.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 137.1 CE; Art. 54.1 CE: Professional fees incurred in incidental procedures derived from amparo appeals are not state-funded and thus cannot be claimed from the public budget.

Keywords

AI generated
constitutional appeal fees state budget allocation incidental procedure costs professional indemnity public funding limits

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 137.1 CE
Art. 54.1 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Eugenio Díaz Eimil.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 137-1987

Fecha de resolución

18/04/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Declarando no haber lugar a tener por indebidos los honorarios profesionales que se reclaman en procedimiento incidental derivado del recurso de amparo 137/1987

Resumen

Abogado y Procurador: honorarios devengados en procedimiento constitucional.

Don Alfonso Misa Espina y la Entidad mercantil «Manuel Barreiro, Sociedad Anónima», interponen recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sección Tercera de la Audiencia Provincial de Sevilla que revoca la dictada por el Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 8 y

condena por delito de descubrimento de secretos.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00406-1987_00137.pdf