Constitutional appeal dismissed due to applicant's indefensibility and lack of constitutional content in the claim.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by José Carlos Pérez García and others against a Supreme Court ruling on bankruptcy proceedings. The applicants argued that their rights under Article 24 of the Constitution were violated, but the court found the claim lacked constitutional content and was attributable to the applicant's own indefensibility. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the procedural defects were the responsibility of the party seeking redress.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24 C.E.; The Constitutional Court rejects an appeal for protection when the claim lacks constitutional content or when the indefensibility is attributable to the applicant.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Cuarta
Magistrados
Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 1561-1987
Fecha de resolución
08/04/1988
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.561/1987
Resumen
Inadmisión. Indefensión: imputable al recurrente. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
Don José Carlos Pérez Garcia y otros interponen recurso de amparo contra Auto de la Sala Primera del Tribunal Supremo que inadmite recurso de casación contra Sentencia de la Sala de lo Civil de la Audiencia Territorial de Oviedo, en procedimiento sobre
declaración de quiebra. Invocan la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en art. 24 C. E.
containers
Visualización
containers