Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 380/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:380A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to unproven notification date and lack of congruence in the contested labor judgment.

Case Number AUTO 380/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Pavimentos del Sureste against a final labor judgment regarding seniority recognition. The applicant argued that the lower court's decision violated Article 24 of the Constitution, but the Court found the procedural timeline unproven and the resolution lacking congruence. Consequently, the court rejected the request for suspension of execution and dismissed the constitutional remedy.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 C.E.; The Constitutional Court declares an appeal inadmissible when the applicant fails to prove the notification date of the contested resolution and the decision lacks congruence with the facts.

Keywords

AI generated
Constitutional appeal inadmissibility procedural notification date congruence of judgment Article 24 CE violation labor seniority recognition suspension of execution final labor judgment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 C.E.
derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de la Sentencia recurrida.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1726-1987

Fecha de resolución

24/03/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.726/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: fecha de notificación no acreditada. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: congruencia de la resolución recurrida. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

«Pavimentos del Sureste, Sociedad Anónima», interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 2 de Alicante, confirmada en suplicación, resolutoria de demanda de reconocimiento de antigüedad. Invoca la vulneración de los

derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de la Sentencia recurrida.

containers

Visualización

containers