Constitutional court dismisses amparo for eviction due to lack of legal challenge to judicial decision.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the amparo appeal filed by Doña Juana Jiménez García against a district court eviction order. The applicant argued that the judicial decision violated her right to a court under Article 24.1 of the Constitution, but the court found no legal challenge to the underlying judicial act. Consequently, the court ruled that the effective protection of judges and tribunals precluded the amparo remedy in this context.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 43 C.E.: The amparo remedy for violation of the right to a court is inadmissible when the contested act is a judicial decision itself, as the effective protection of judges and tribunals excludes direct constitutional review of such rulings.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Cuarta
Magistrados
Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 1136-1987
Fecha de resolución
24/03/1988
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.136/1987
Resumen
Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: cuestión de legalidad. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
Doña Juana Jiménez García interpone recurso de amparo contra providencia del Juzgado de Distrito núm. 20 de Madrid en autos sobre desahucio. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
containers
Visualización
containers