Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 369/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:369A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses amparo for permanent disability invalidity, citing lack of procedural exhaustion.

Case Number AUTO 369/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court dismissed the amparo filed by Tomás Aceituno Cuesta against a labor court judgment denying his claim for permanent disability invalidity. The applicant invoked violations of constitutional rights regarding equality, non-discrimination, and judicial protection. The court rejected the appeal because the applicant failed to exhaust the ordinary judicial remedies required before seeking constitutional protection.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 43 C.E.: The right to judicial protection does not apply when the ordinary legal remedies have not been exhausted prior to filing an amparo.

Keywords

AI generated
exhaustion of remedies amparo inadmissibility permanent disability judicial protection labor court judgment constitutional rights procedural requirement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 14 C.E.
Art. 15 C.E.
Art. 29.1 C.E.
Art. 43 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 742-1987

Fecha de resolución

24/03/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando el archivo de las actuaciones en el procedimiento 742/987

Resumen

Demanda de amparo: inexistencia.

Tomás Aceituno Cuesta interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Magistratura de Trabajo de Badajoz que desestimó demanda en autos sobre invalidez permanente. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 10.1, 14, 15, 24.1 y

29.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers