Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for equal treatment regarding pension rights granted to one judge.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by a judge against a decision revoking her pension rights previously granted to a colleague. The appellant argued that this differential treatment violated her right to equality under Article 14 of the Constitution, while the opposing party contended that the original decision was based on specific judicial conduct. The court ruled that since the Tribunal Central had already rejected the claim in identical circumstances, the current appeal lacked the necessary concurrence of facts to warrant constitutional review.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 14 C.E.; Art. 54.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court may not admit an appeal for constitutional protection if the same facts and legal grounds were previously rejected by the same court in an identical case.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Segunda
Magistrados
Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 1018-1986
Fecha de resolución
21/03/1988
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.018/1986
Resumen
Inadmisión. Desestimación previa por el Tribunal Constitucional en idéntico supuesto: se da la concurrencia.
Doña María de los Angeles Garrido Torres interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Cuarta del Tribunal Central de Trabajo, que revoca la dictada por la Magistratura núm. 1 de Jaén, que había concedido a la recurrente el derecho a las
prestaciones de jubilación. Invoca la vulneración del derecho a la igualdad ante la Ley, consagrado en el art. 14 C.E.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00360-1986_01018.pdf