Constitutional court dismisses appeal due to procedural expiration of the action's time limit.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Doña Rosa Mascarell Ripoll against a labor court judgment denying her disability claim. She argued that the decision violated her right to a court under Article 24 of the Constitution, but the court found the procedural deadline had expired. Consequently, the action was rejected because the claim was no longer timely filed.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24 C.E.; Art. 40.1 LEC: The right to a court is not applicable when the action is filed after the statutory time limit has expired, rendering the claim inadmissible.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Tercera
Magistrados
Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 1731-1987
Fecha de resolución
16/03/1988
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.731/1987
Resumen
Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: caducidad de la acción.
Doña Rosa Mascarell Ripoll interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 6 de Valencia, desestimatoria de demanda por invalidez. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24 de la C.E.
containers
Visualización
containers