Constitutional Court dismisses amparo for lack of legal standing regarding incompatible activity cessation.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the amparo filed by Mr. Martínez Ramón against a Barcelona court ruling on his incompatible activity cessation. He argued this violated his right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution, but the Court found his claim lacked the necessary legal standing. Consequently, the remedy was rejected because the underlying administrative act did not constitute a direct violation of constitutional rights requiring this specific judicial review.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 53.1 C.E.: The amparo remedy is inadmissible when the applicant lacks direct legal standing to challenge the administrative act, as the constitutional right invoked is not directly affected by the contested decision.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Primera
Magistrados
Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Eugenio Díaz Eimil.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 1676-1987
Fecha de resolución
14/03/1988
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.676/1987
Resumen
Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: cuestión de legalidad. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
Don Manuel Martínez Ramón interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Tercera de lo Contencioso-Administrativo de la Audiencia Territorial de Barcelona, en recurso contra resolución de la Diputación de Barcelona sobre cese en actividad
incompatible. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00331-1987_01676.pdf