Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 330/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:330A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to exhaustion of judicial remedies and lack of constitutional violation.

Case Number AUTO 330/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to exhaust judicial remedies before seeking constitutional protection. The company challenged a labor court decision regarding pension base calculations, arguing a violation of the right to a court under Article 24.1 of the Constitution. The court rejected this claim as the applicant did not pursue all available legal avenues prior to filing the constitutional complaint.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 43 C.E.: The right to a court is not violated when the applicant fails to exhaust judicial remedies before filing a constitutional appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
exhaustion of remedies constitutional appeal labor law dispute pension calculation right to court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 43 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1646-1987

Fecha de resolución

14/03/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.646/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Agotamiento de recursos en la vía juidicial; inexistencia.

«Montajes y Prefabricados, Sociedad Anónima», interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Magistratura de Trabajo de Sevilla núm. 1, en autos sobre cuantía de las bases reguladoras de las pensiones de viudedad y orfandad. Invoca la vulneración del

derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00330-1987_01646.pdf