Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 321/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:321A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of formal invocation of Article 24.1 CE rights.

Case Number AUTO 321/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to formally invoke the specific rights under Article 24.1 of the Constitution. Although the underlying labor sanction was contested, the applicant did not explicitly link the alleged violation to the effective judicial protection guaranteed by the Constitution. Consequently, the court ruled that without this formal invocation, the appeal could not proceed to a merits review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 53.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court must reject an appeal for amparo if the applicant fails to formally invoke the specific constitutional rights they claim are violated.

Keywords

AI generated
formal invocation requirement effective judicial protection Article 24.1 CE inadmissible appeal constitutional amparo procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 53.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1560-1987

Fecha de resolución

14/03/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.560/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: cuestión de legalidad. Actividad probatoria. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Antonio Vidal Romero interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 2 de León, en autos sobre impugnación de sanción laboral. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00321-1987_01560.pdf