Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 320/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:320A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of formal invocation of Article 24.1 CE rights.

Case Number AUTO 320/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Vicente Gallega Valero against a Supreme Court decision refusing cassation. The applicants formally invoked the right to judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution but failed to substantiate the specific constitutional content of the alleged violation. The court ruled that without a clear demonstration of how the right was infringed, the appeal could not proceed to substantive examination.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; The Constitutional Court requires a formal invocation of the right to judicial protection coupled with a specific demonstration of its constitutional content; mere invocation without substantiation results in inadmissibility.

Keywords

AI generated
right to judicial protection formal invocation requirement constitutional content of claim inadmissibility of appeal Article 24.1 CE

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Invocan la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1556-1987

Fecha de resolución

14/03/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.556/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Vicente Gallega Valero y otra interponen recurso de amparo contra Auto de la Sala Primera del Tribunal Supremo que acuerda no haber lugar a la admisión de recurso de casación contra Sentencia de la Sala Segunda de lo Civil de la Audiencia Territorial

de Valencia, que subsidiariamente se recurre también, en autos de menor cuantía sobre nulidad de documento. Invocan la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00320-1987_01556.pdf