Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 314/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:314A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of procedural content and no violation of presumption of innocence.

Case Number AUTO 314/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible for lack of procedural content and found no violation of the right to a trial within a reasonable time. The applicant argued that the appellate court's decision to revoke the first-instance judgment and impose a heavier penalty violated his presumption of innocence and right to defense. The Court rejected these claims, noting that the procedural defect precluded examination of the merits and that the reformatio in peius principle was not violated.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 CE; Art. 24.2 CE: The Constitutional Court lacks jurisdiction to examine the merits of an appeal when the petition lacks procedural content, and the principle of reformatio in peius does not apply to invalidate a final judgment that increases the penalty.

Keywords

AI generated
recurso de amparo carencia de contenido procesal reformatio in peius presunción de inocencia sentencia de apelación

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 CE
consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.
Art. 24.2 CE
consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Eugenio Díaz Eimil.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1450-1987

Fecha de resolución

14/03/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.450/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. «Reformatio in peius»: no violado. Derecho a la presunción de inocencia. Prueba indiciaria. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Jesús Julián Alcarria Martínez interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Cuenca que en apelación revoca la del Juzgado de Instrucción y condena por delito de lesiones leves. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos

consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00314-1987_01450.pdf