Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of formal invocation of rights and substantive merit.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Mr. Moreno Muñoz against a provincial court's dismissal of his request for a public defender. The petitioner argued that his right to legal representation was violated, but the Court found no formal invocation of the specific constitutional right and deemed the claim substantively meritless. Consequently, the appeal was rejected without examining the underlying merits of the case.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24 CE; Art. 54 CE: The Constitutional Court rejects an appeal for lack of formal invocation of the right and absence of merit.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Primera
Magistrados
Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Eugenio Díaz Eimil.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 1284-1987
Fecha de resolución
14/03/1988
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.284/1987
Resumen
Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
Don Nicolás Moreno Muñoz solicita el nombramiento de Procurador del turno de oficio para interponer recurso de amparo contra el Auto de la Audiencia Provincial de Madrid, desestimatorio de recurso de súplica.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00306-1987_01284.pdf