Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 302/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:302A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to lack of merit and failure to substantiate the claim for prison benefits.

Case Number AUTO 302/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Ignacio Núñez Gutiérrez regarding his request for official appointment of a lawyer and prosecutor. The petitioner argued that the prison authorities failed to grant him paid work and social security benefits, violating Article 25.2 of the Constitution. The court rejected the claim because the petition lacked merit and did not meet the necessary procedural requirements for admissibility.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 25.2 C.E.; Art. 24 C.E.: The Constitutional Court declares an appeal inadmissible when the petition lacks merit or fails to substantiate the alleged constitutional violation.

Keywords

AI generated
Constitutional Appeal Prison Benefits Social Security Rights Lack of Merit Procedural Defects

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 25.2 C.E.
Invoca como vulnerado el derecho consagrado en el art. 25.2 C.E.
Art. 24 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 87-1987

Fecha de resolución

14/03/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 87/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Defectos de la demanda: subsanación. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Ignacio Núñez Gutiérrez solicita el nombramiento de Abogado y Procurador de oficio para formalizar recurso de amparo contra Autos del Juzgado de Vigilancia Penitenciaria y de la Audiencia Provincial que no le otorgan los beneficios solicitados de un

trabajo remunerado y seguridad social en la prisión. Invoca como vulnerado el derecho consagrado en el art. 25.2 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00302-1987_00087.pdf