Constitutional Court admits amparo appeal regarding procedural delays and unacknowledged notification dates in a dishonest abuse case.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court admitted the amparo appeal filed by Don José Rejón Gutiérrez against a conviction for dishonest abuse and the Supreme Court's dismissal of his cassation. Rejón argued that his rights under Articles 24.1 and 2 of the Constitution were violated due to unacknowledged notification dates and procedural delays. The Court decided to admit the case for examination because the procedural irregularities potentially affected the fairness of the trial.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24.1 y 2 C.E.; The Constitutional Court admits an amparo appeal when procedural delays or unacknowledged notifications may have compromised the right to a fair trial.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Segunda
Magistrados
Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 931-1987
Fecha de resolución
07/03/1988
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la admisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 931/1987
Resumen
Admisión. Plazos procesales: fecha de notificación no acreditada.
Don José Rejón Gutiérrez interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Bilbao, condenatoria por delito de abusos deshonestos, y Auto de la Sala Segunda del Tribunal Supremo que inadmite recurso de casacion. Invoca la
vulneracion de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00300-1987_00931.pdf