Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 287/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:287A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal remedy due to lack of effective judicial protection and procedural defects.

Case Number AUTO 287/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal remedy filed by a civil servant against disciplinary sanctions. The petitioner argued that the proceedings violated his rights to effective judicial protection and legal certainty under Articles 24.1 and 2 of the Constitution. The court rejected these claims because the lower administrative and judicial bodies had already provided sufficient legal remedies, rendering the appeal remedy unnecessary and procedurally flawed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 CE; Art. 2 CE: The appeal remedy is inadmissible when the lower courts have already offered adequate legal protection, thereby depriving the constitutional remedy of its essential function of ensuring effective judicial protection.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection appeal remedy inadmissibility procedural exhaustion disciplinary sanctions legal certainty constitutional court review administrative appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 CE
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.
Art. 2 CE
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1712-1987

Fecha de resolución

29/02/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.712/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: inadmisión de recurso de apelación. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Antonio T. de Molina de Molina interpone recurso de amparo contra Acuerdos del Ayuntamiento de Argentona y resoluciones de la Sala Tercera de lo Contencioso-Administrativo de la Audiencia Territorial de Barcelona y de la Quinta del Tribunal Supremo,

sobre expediente disciplinario por faltas graves, con suspensión de empleo y sueldo. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers