Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 278/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:278A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal for lack of effective judicial protection due to insufficient sentence motivation.

Case Number AUTO 278/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Carlos de Roselló Moreno against a provincial court judgment. The appellant argued that the lower court's decision violated Article 24.1 of the Constitution by failing to provide adequate reasoning. The court rejected this claim, ruling that the lack of detailed motivation in the contested sentence did not constitute a violation of the right to effective judicial protection.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; The right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution is not violated by a lack of detailed motivation in a judgment if the decision remains legally sound and the procedural guarantees were respected.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection judicial motivation constitutional appeal Article 24.1 CE procedural guarantees

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1590-1987

Fecha de resolución

29/02/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.590/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: motivación de la Sentencia. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Carlos de Roselló Moreno interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sección Tercera de la Audiencia Provincial de Madrid, que en apelación revoca la del Juzgado de Distrito núm. 12, en autos de cognición sobre reclamación de cantidad. Invoca

la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers