Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 267/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:267A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of legal interest due to absence of judicial review of the contested act.

Case Number AUTO 267/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Mr. Carlos José Urbano González against a provincial court conviction for coercion. The applicant argued that the lower court's decision violated his rights under Articles 24.1 and 2 of the Constitution by failing to review the legality of the underlying administrative act. The Court rejected this claim because the specific administrative act in question was already subject to judicial review, rendering the appeal for constitutional protection legally unfounded.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 2 C.E.: The right to judicial protection does not extend to cases where the contested administrative act is already subject to judicial review, as the requirement of legal interest is not met.

Keywords

AI generated
judicial protection legal interest administrative act judicial review constitutional appeal effective remedy procedural admissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.
Art. 2 C.E.
vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Eugenio Díaz Eimil.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1494-1987

Fecha de resolución

29/02/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.494/1987

Resumen

Inadmision. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: cuestión de legalidad. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Carlos José Urbano González interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sección Segunda de la Audiencia Provincial de Córdoba que en apelación revoca la del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 4 y condena por una falta de coacciones. Invoca la

vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00267-1987_01494.pdf