Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of formal lawyer signature violating right to court access.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Doña Alicia Isabel Bayarri González and others against a provincial court decision rejecting a document due to the absence of a lawyer's signature. The petitioners argued this procedural rejection violated their constitutional right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution. The Court ruled that the formal defect precluded the document from being considered, thereby justifying the dismissal of the constitutional complaint without reaching the merits of the alleged rights violation.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24.1 C.E.; The absence of a formal lawyer's signature on a procedural document constitutes a fatal defect that precludes its admission, and the Constitutional Court lacks jurisdiction to review the merits of such formal exclusions.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Segunda
Magistrados
Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 1318-1987
Fecha de resolución
29/02/1988
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.318/1987
Resumen
Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta.
Doña Alicia Isabel Bayarri González y otros interponen recurso de amparo contra Auto de la Sección Cuarta de la Audiencia Provincial de Valencia, que inadmite un escrito por falta de flrma de Procurador, en causa procedente del Juzgado de Instrucción
núm. 10 de Valencia. Invocan la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00252-1987_01318.pdf