Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 212/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:212A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to failure to exhaust judicial remedies before filing.

Case Number AUTO 212/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to exhaust judicial remedies prior to filing. The applicant sought protection for rights under Articles 14, 24, 18.2, 33, 35, and 38 of the Constitution regarding a municipal seizure of rental rooms. The court ruled that the lack of prior judicial review rendered the constitutional complaint procedurally invalid.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 CE; Art. 43 CE: The right to judicial protection is conditional upon the prior exhaustion of ordinary legal remedies; a constitutional appeal is inadmissible if the applicant has not first sought redress through the ordinary judicial system.

Keywords

AI generated
exhaustion of remedies judicial protection constitutional appeal procedural inadmissibility ordinary courts

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 CE
Art. 43 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Eugenio Díaz Eimil.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1512-1987

Fecha de resolución

15/02/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.512/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Agotamiento de recursos en la vía judicial: inexistencia.

Doña Bernardina González Fernández interpone recurso de amparo contra Auto de la Sala Quinta del Tribunal Supremo, que desestima recurso contra Auto de la Sala Tercera de lo Contencioso-Administrativo de la Audiencia Territorial de Barcelona, que

inadmite recurso contra acto del Ayuntamiento sobre precintado de habltaciones de una pensión. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 14, 24, 18.2, 33, 35 y 38 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de la resolución

recurrida.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00212-1987_01512.pdf