Constitutional appeal dismissed due to failure to cure defects and lack of constitutional content in the demand.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Hoteles Costablanca, S.A. against a non-prosecution order, citing procedural defects and a lack of constitutional substance. The applicant argued that their right to a court under Article 24 of the Constitution was violated by the lower court's refusal to reform the dismissal. The court rejected this claim because the demand failed to cure its formal deficiencies and did not demonstrate a genuine constitutional issue. Consequently, the appeal was not admitted for substantive review.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24 C.E.; The Constitutional Court's jurisdiction requires a demand that is procedurally regular and substantively demonstrates a violation of constitutional rights; appeals lacking these elements are inadmissible.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Primera
Magistrados
Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Eugenio Díaz Eimil.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 1486-1987
Fecha de resolución
15/02/1988
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.486/1987
Resumen
Inadmisión. Defectos de la demanda: no subsanación. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
«Hoteles Costablanca, S. A.», interpone recurso de amparo contra providencia del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 14 de Valencia que acuerda no haber lugar al recurso de reforma contra Auto que acordó el sobreseimiento en diligencias previas 4.168/1986-1.
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00210-1987_01486.pdf