Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 203/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:203A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal for lack of constitutional content and procedural congruence.

Case Number AUTO 203/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Fernando Gil Moreno against a housing eviction judgment. The petitioner argued that the lower court's decision violated his right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution. The court rejected this claim because the contested judgment was procedurally congruent and lacked the necessary constitutional content to warrant constitutional review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 53.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court lacks jurisdiction to review judgments that are procedurally congruent and do not contain a direct violation of constitutional rights.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection procedural congruence constitutional content housing eviction inadmissible appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 C.E. Solicita la suspensión del acto recurrido.
Art. 53.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1427-1987

Fecha de resolución

15/02/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.427/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: congruencia de la Sentencia recurrida. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Fernando Gil Moreno interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Distrito de Vélez-Málaga en autos sobre resolución de arrendamiento urbano, y de la Audiencia Provincial, Sección Primera, confirmatoria en apelación. Invoca la

vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 C.E. Solicita la suspensión del acto recurrido.

containers

Visualización

containers