Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 201/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:201A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal regarding right to presumption of innocence due to lack of procedural demand content.

Case Number AUTO 201/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to substantiate the constitutional complaint with specific procedural grounds. The petitioner challenged a criminal conviction for vehicle misuse and theft, claiming a violation of the right to a fair trial under Article 24.2 of the Constitution. The Court ruled that without a detailed argument linking the facts to the specific constitutional defect, the complaint lacks the necessary content to proceed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.2 C.E.; The constitutional complaint must contain a precise statement of the alleged defect in the procedural development, as a generic invocation of the right to a fair trial without specific grounds is inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
presumption of innocence procedural demand content constitutional complaint inadmissibility right to fair trial criminal procedure defects

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.2 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.2 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de la Sentencia recurrida.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1424-1987

Fecha de resolución

15/02/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.424/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Derecho a la presunción de inocencia: actividad probatoria. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Jesús Ramón Fernandez Esteban interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 1 de Valladolid condenatoria por delito de utilización ilegítima de vehículos de motor y falta de hurto, y la confirmatoria en apelación de la

Audiencia Provincial. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.2 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de la Sentencia recurrida.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00201-1987_01424.pdf