Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 185/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:185A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to unproven notification date causing procedural expiration of the action.

Case Number AUTO 185/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to prove the date of notification of the lower court's judgment. The applicant, Galicia Insurance Company, argued that the judgment violated Article 24 of the Constitution, but the court found no evidence of the notification date. Consequently, the court ruled that the procedural deadline for filing the appeal had expired, barring the claim.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 C.E.; Art. 10.1 LEC: The right to a court is conditional upon the timely exercise of the action; failure to prove the date of notification results in the expiration of the procedural deadline and the inadmissibility of the appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural expiration notification date proof Art. 24 Constitution inadmissible appeal statute of limitations

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 C.E.
la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E.
Art. 10.1 LEC

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1152-1987

Fecha de resolución

15/02/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.152/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: fecha de notificación no acreditada: caducidad de la acción.

«Galicia, Sociedad Anónima de Seguros y Reaseguros», interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Distrito de Muros, confirmada en apelación por el Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Noya en autos de juicio de faltas por imprudencia. Invoca

la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00185-1987_01152.pdf