Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 182/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:182A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal for inadmissibility due to lack of constitutional content in the eviction demand.

Case Number AUTO 182/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the underlying eviction demand lacked sufficient constitutional content to justify judicial review. The appellant, Eduardo Enríquez Barroso, challenged a first-instance judgment revoking a previous eviction order by invoking Article 24 of the Constitution regarding effective judicial protection. The court ruled that the specific legal arguments presented did not meet the threshold for constitutional admissibility, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 C.E.; Art. 44.1 C.E.: An appeal for constitutional protection is inadmissible if the challenged judgment lacks the necessary constitutional content to be examined under the effective judicial protection guarantee.

Keywords

AI generated
constitutional protection appeal effective judicial protection eviction demand content inadmissibility threshold Article 24 Constitution

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 C.E.
Art. 44.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 777-1987

Fecha de resolución

15/02/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 777/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: valoración de la prueba. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Eduardo Enríquez Barroso interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Primera Instancia núm. 4 de Madrid, que revoca la dictada por el de Distrito núm. 28 y estima demanda de desahucio. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en

el art. 24 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers