Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 160/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:160A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of legal interest due to effective judicial remedy availability.

Case Number AUTO 160/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant had already obtained effective judicial protection through the Supreme Court. The applicant, Carzuh S.L., argued that the labor court's dismissal decision violated Article 24.1 of the Constitution, but the Supreme Court had already reviewed and upheld the ruling. The court rejected the appeal since the existence of a final judicial decision rendered the constitutional complaint unnecessary and devoid of legal interest.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 53.1 C.E.: When a final judicial decision exists, the right to effective judicial protection is satisfied, rendering the constitutional appeal inadmissible for lack of legal interest.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection legal interest requirement final judicial decision constitutional appeal inadmissibility Article 24.1 Constitution

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 de la C.E.
Art. 53.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Eugenio Díaz Eimil.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1396-1987

Fecha de resolución

01/02/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.396/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: cuestión de legalidad. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

«Carzuh, Sociedad Limitada», interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Sexta del Tribunal Supremo que estima recurso de casación contra la dictada por la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 4 de Vigo, en autos sobre despido. Invoca la vulneración

del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 de la C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00160-1987_01396.pdf