Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 154/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:154A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses amparo for failure to formally invoke specific constitutional rights violated.

Case Number AUTO 154/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the amparo inadmissible because the petitioner failed to formally invoke the specific constitutional rights they claimed were violated. The Gremio challenged a Supreme Court ruling confirming an administrative sanction regarding traffic tax regulations, citing Articles 14, 9.3, 24, 31, 51, and 133.2 of the Constitution. The court ruled that without a precise formal invocation of the exact articles, the procedural requirements for admitting the appeal were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 43.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court must reject an amparo if the applicant fails to formally and specifically invoke the constitutional rights they allege have been violated.

Keywords

AI generated
formal invocation requirement inadmissible amparo procedural defect specific constitutional rights Constitutional Court jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 43.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1289-1987

Fecha de resolución

01/02/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.289/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta.

El Gremio de Consignatarios Mayoristas Concesionarios del Mercado Central de Pescados, Mariscos Frescos y Congelados de Barcelona y Provincia interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Tercera del Tribunal Supremo en apelación de la dictada

por la Sala Segunda de lo Contencioso- Administrativo de la Audiencia Territorial de Barcelona, que resulta confirmada, en recurso sobre el Reglamento del Impuesto General sobre el Tráfico de Empresas. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados

en los artículos 14, 9.3, 24, 31, 51 y 133.2 y 3 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00154-1987_01289.pdf