Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 148/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:148A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses amparo due to procedural expiration of the action's filing deadline.

Case Number AUTO 148/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the amparo inadmissible because the procedural deadline for filing the action had expired. The Association of Professional Employees of the Savings Bank challenged a labor court judgment regarding a collective conflict, invoking violations of Articles 14, 23, and 28.1 of the Constitution. The court ruled that the claim was time-barred, preventing the examination of the alleged constitutional infringements.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 43.1 C.E.; Art. 44 C.E.: The constitutional remedy is inadmissible when the action is filed after the expiration of the statutory time limits.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural expiration constitutional remedy time bar collective conflict labor law filing deadline constitutional court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 43.1 C.E.
Art. 44 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1246-1987

Fecha de resolución

01/02/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.246/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: caducidad de la acción.

Asociación Profesional de Empleados de la Caja de Ahorros y Monte de Piedad de Madrid interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Tribunal Central de Trabajo que en suplicación confirma la de la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 23 de Madrid, en autos

sobre conflicto colectivo. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 14, 23 y 28.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00148-1987_01246.pdf