Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 141/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:141A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to procedural expiration of the right to sue.

Case Number AUTO 141/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the procedural deadline for filing had expired. The applicant challenged a civil judgment denying damages, arguing violations of the right to a court under Articles 24.1 and 2 of the Constitution. The court rejected the claim, ruling that the action was time-barred and thus could not be processed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 CE; Art. 2 CE: The right to judicial protection is subject to statutory time limits, and failure to file within the prescribed period results in the loss of the right to bring the action.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural expiration statute of limitations right to court constitutional appeal time bar civil judgment inadmissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 CE
Invoca la vulneración del art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.
Art. 2 CE
Invoca la vulneración del art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1212-1987

Fecha de resolución

01/02/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.212/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: caducidad de la acción.

Don Jesús Rodrigo Salmerón interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Distrito de Guadalajara, condenatoria por falta de daños, y la confirmatoria en apelación del Juzgado de Instrucción. Invoca la vulneración del art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.

Solicita la suspensión del acto recurrido.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00141-1987_01212.pdf