Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 135/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:135A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses unemployment benefit appeal due to procedural defects and lack of legal comparison.

Case Number AUTO 135/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the unemployment benefit appeal inadmissible due to procedural defects and a lack of legal comparison. The applicant argued violations of constitutional rights regarding equality and social security, but the court found the request failed to meet formal requirements. Consequently, the court rejected the claim without examining the merits of the alleged rights violations.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 44.1 C.E.; Art. 44.2 C.E.: The Constitutional Court must reject an appeal for protection if the request lacks the necessary legal comparison or contains formal defects preventing its examination.

Keywords

AI generated
Constitutional Court Unemployment Benefits Procedural Defects Legal Comparison Appeal for Protection Constitutional Rights Inadmissible Request

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 9.3 C.E.
de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 9.3, 14, 25 y 35 C.E.
Art. 14 C.E.
Art. 25 C.E.
Art. 35 C.E.
Art. 44.1 C.E.
Art. 44.2 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1070-1987

Fecha de resolución

01/02/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.070/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Defectos de la demanda: subsanación. Principio de legalidad penal: acto administrativo. Principio de igualdad: falta término de comparación. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Doña Concepción Poley Gómez interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Magistratura de Trabajo de Sevilla núm. 3, declarada firme por Auto del Tribunal Central de Trabajo, denegatoria del derecho al subsidio de desempleo. Invoca la vulneración

de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 9.3, 14, 25 y 35 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00135-1987_01070.pdf