Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 134/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:134A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal against dismissal due to lack of effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 CE.

Case Number AUTO 134/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Francisco Arbós Paredes against a Supreme Court dismissal judgment. The applicant argued that the proceedings violated his right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution. The Court rejected this claim because the existing judicial review mechanisms were deemed sufficient to address the alleged defects.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; The right to effective judicial protection does not require the creation of new procedural remedies when existing review systems adequately safeguard legal interests.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection dismissal appeal judicial review constitutional complaint procedural adequacy

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1049-1987

Fecha de resolución

01/02/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.049/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión: Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: inadmisión de demanda de despido; juicio de revisión. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Francisco Arbós Paredes interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Sexta del Tribunal Supremo que en recurso de revisión confirma la del Tribunal Central de Trabajo, confirmatoria, a su vez, de la dictada por la Magistratura de Trabajo

núm. 7 de Barcelona, en autos sobre despido. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00134-1987_01049.pdf