Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 115/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:115A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal for lack of formal invocation of Article 24 rights.

Case Number AUTO 115/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to formally invoke the specific constitutional rights violated. The petitioner sought a public defender to challenge a divorce judgment, claiming a violation of Article 24 of the Constitution. The court ruled that without a clear and formal assertion of the right to effective judicial protection, the appeal could not proceed to substantive review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 C.E.; Art. 54.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court must reject an appeal for amparo if the applicant fails to formally and specifically invoke the constitutional rights they claim have been violated.

Keywords

AI generated
formal invocation requirement effective judicial protection constitutional appeal inadmissibility divorce judgment challenge public defender appointment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de la Sentencia recurrida.
Art. 54.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 309-1987

Fecha de resolución

01/02/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 309/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Tomás Ruiz Belén solicita la designación de Abogado y Procurador del turno de oficio a fin de interponer recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala de lo Civil de la Audiencia Territorial de Albacete, que confirma la del Juzgado de Primera

Instancia de Hellín, estimatoria de demanda de divorcio. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de la Sentencia recurrida.

containers

Visualización

containers