Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 96/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:96A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed for lack of admissibility due to prescription of the underlying criminal offense.

Case Number AUTO 96/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Doña Isabel Rodríguez Martínez against a judgment that acquitted her of a charge based on prescription. She argued that this outcome violated her right to a court under Article 24 of the Constitution. The court rejected the claim because the underlying criminal offense had already expired, rendering the constitutional complaint procedurally unfounded.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 C.E.; Art. 44.1 CE: The Constitutional Court lacks jurisdiction to examine appeals regarding cases where the underlying criminal offense has prescribed, as the right to a court is not violated by the expiration of the statute of limitations.

Keywords

AI generated
prescription of offense constitutional appeal inadmissibility right to a court statute of limitations criminal acquittal Article 24 Constitution procedural exhaustion

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E.
Art. 44.1 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1353-1987

Fecha de resolución

20/01/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.353/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Postulación: inexistencia.

Doña Isabel Rodríguez Martínez interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 19 de Madrid, que revoca la dictada por el Juzgado de Distrito núm. 22 y absuelve al denunciado de la falta de que se le acusaba, por razón de

haber prescrito. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers