Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 89/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:89A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of effective judicial protection due to missing demand content.

Case Number AUTO 89/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the plaintiff failed to substantiate the claim with sufficient content. Don José María Maldonado Nausía challenged a Supreme Court ruling confirming a contract termination and loss of bail, alleging a violation of Article 24.1 of the Constitution. The court rejected the claim as the demand lacked the necessary material elements to constitute a violation of effective judicial protection.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 43 C.E.: An appeal for protection of rights is inadmissible if the demand lacks the content required to establish a violation of effective judicial protection.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection content of demand constitutional appeal Supreme Court review contract termination loss of bail Article 24.1 CE

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 43 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Eugenio Díaz Eimil.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1272-1987

Fecha de resolución

20/01/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.272/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: derecho no violado. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don José María Maldonado Nausía interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Especial de Revisión del Tribunal Supremo que confirma la de la Sala Tercera del TS en recurso sobre resolución de contrato, con pérdida de fianza, acordada por el

Ministerio de Cultura. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00089-1987_01272.pdf