Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 80/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:80A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to unproven notification date and lack of constitutional content in the complaint.

Case Number AUTO 80/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Francisco Iturrino Ruiz against a court ruling absolving him of verbal abuse charges. The applicant argued violations of equality and right to defense, but the Court found the procedural notification date unproven and the complaint lacked sufficient constitutional substance. Consequently, the appeal was rejected without examining the merits of the alleged rights violations.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 14 C.E.: The Constitutional Court must reject an appeal if the notification date is not substantiated and the complaint fails to demonstrate a clear violation of constitutional rights.

Keywords

AI generated
Constitutional appeal inadmissibility Procedural notification date Lack of constitutional content Right to defense violation Equality rights claim

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 14 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 14 y 24.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Eugenio Díaz Eimil.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1194-1987

Fecha de resolución

20/01/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.194/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: fecha de notificación no acreditada. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Francisco Iturrino Ruiz interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Distrito núm. 8, de Madrid, y la confirmatoria en apelación del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 10, absolutoria de denuncia de malos tratos de palabra que motivó juicio

de faltas. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 14 y 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00080-1987_01194.pdf