Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 77/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:77A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal due to procedural expiration of the action's filing deadline.

Case Number AUTO 77/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Adriano Rodríguez Rivas and others against labor court decisions refusing clarification of a dismissal judgment. The applicants argued this violated their right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution, but the court found the action expired due to the lapse of the statutory time limit. Consequently, the remedy was rejected because the procedural requirement for timely filing was not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; The constitutional remedy for violation of the right to effective judicial protection is inadmissible if the action is filed after the expiration of the legally prescribed time limit.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural expiration constitutional appeal statutory time limit effective judicial protection dismissal of action

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1180-1987

Fecha de resolución

20/01/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.180/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: caducidad de la acción.

Don Adriano Rodríguez Rivas y otros interponen recurso de amparo contra providencias de la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 3 de Vigo que acuerdan no acceder a la aclaración de la Sentencia dictada en procedimiento sobre despido. Invocan la vulneración del

art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Conceptos materiales

Visualización

containers

Incompatibilidades profesionalesIncompatibilidades profesionales