Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 73/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:73A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to applicant's indefensibility and lack of constitutional demand content.

Case Number AUTO 73/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal Constitucional declared inadmissible the appeal against a court ruling annulling a public job assignment decision. The applicant, a non-sanitary staff member, claimed a violation of the right to access public offices under Article 24.1 of the Constitution, but the court found the proceedings were her own fault and the constitutional claim lacked necessary content. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the applicant failed to meet procedural requirements for admissibility.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 54.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court must declare an appeal inadmissible if the applicant is at fault for indefensibility or if the constitutional demand lacks the required content.

Keywords

AI generated
right to access public offices indefensibility attributable to applicant lack of constitutional demand content admissibility of constitutional appeal procedural fault in appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 54.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1129-1987

Fecha de resolución

20/01/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.129/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Derecho a acceder a los cargos públicos: cuestión de legalidad. Indefensión: imputable al recurrente. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Doña Pilar Nieto Tubilla interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Segunda de lo Contencioso-Administrativo de la Audiencia Territorial de Madrid que anula resolución del INSALUD en relación con adjudicación de plazas en concurso-oposición

para el personal no sanitario. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Conceptos materiales

Visualización

containers

Derecho de alimentosDerecho de alimentos

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00073-1987_01129.pdf