Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 50/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:50A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal regarding presumption of innocence due to lack of demand content.

Case Number AUTO 50/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Antonio Nieto Tabares against a criminal conviction. The applicant argued that the proceedings violated his right to the presumption of innocence under Article 24.2 of the Constitution, but the court found the demand lacked necessary content. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because it failed to meet the procedural requirements for admissibility.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.2 C.E.; Art. 10.1 LEC: The Constitutional Court must reject an appeal for protection of rights if the demand lacks the specific content required to establish the alleged violation of constitutional guarantees.

Keywords

AI generated
presumption of innocence procedural admissibility demand content constitutional appeal criminal proceedings

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.2 C.E.
Art. 10.1 LEC

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1374-1987

Fecha de resolución

13/01/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.374/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Derecho a la presunción de inocencia: actividad probatoria. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Antonio Nieto Tabares interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Distrito núm. 14 de Madrid, condenatoria por falta del artículo 586, 3, del Cógido Penal y la confirmatoria en apelación del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 28. Invoca la

vulneración del derecho consagrado en el artículo 24.2 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de la Sentencia recurrida.

containers

Visualización

containers