Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 43/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:43A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to procedural expiration of the action under Article 24.1 CE.

Case Number AUTO 43/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal Constitucional declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Marcelino Lechuga Cruz against a civil court judgment. The appellant argued that the lower court violated his rights under Article 24.1 of the Constitution, but the Court found the claim time-barred. Consequently, the action was rejected because the procedural deadlines had expired, preventing the remedy from being exercised.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 40.1 C.E.: The constitutional appeal is inadmissible when the action has expired due to the lapse of the statutory time limits for filing.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural expiration constitutional appeal statutory time limits Article 24.1 CE inadmissible remedy

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 40.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1278-1987

Fecha de resolución

13/01/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.278/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: caducidad de la acción.

Don Marcelino Lechuga Cruz interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Segunda de lo Civil de la Audiencia Territorial de Granada que revocó la dictada por el Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Baeza, en autos incidentales de juicio ejecutivo.

Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00043-1987_01278.pdf