Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 39/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:39A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to procedural expiration of the action's time limit.

Case Number AUTO 39/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the procedural time limit for filing the action had expired. Doña Josefa María Martín Jiménez sought protection of her rights regarding a divorce judgment but failed to submit the request within the statutory period. The court ruled that the lapse of time barred the remedy regardless of the substantive constitutional claims invoked.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 44.1 C.E.; Art. 24 C.E.: The right to judicial protection is not absolute and is subject to procedural time limits; failure to file within the prescribed period results in the loss of the right to appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural expiration time limit lapse constitutional appeal judicial protection statutory deadline action inadmissible procedural bar

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 44.1 C.E.
Art. 24 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1228-1987

Fecha de resolución

13/01/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.228/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: caducidad de la acción.

Doña Josefa María Martín Jiménez interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Segunda de lo Civil de la Audiencia Territorial de Granada, en apelación de la dictada por el Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 5 de Málaga, sobre separación conyugal.

Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 14, 15 y 24 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00039-1987_01228.pdf