Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 13/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:13A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to procedural expiration and lack of notification to the prosecutor.

Case Number AUTO 13/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the procedural deadline for filing had expired and the defendant failed to prove proper notification to the prosecutor. Alberto Millán Jiménez argued that the lack of notification violated his rights under Articles 14 and 24 of the Constitution regarding equality and effective judicial protection. The court rejected these claims, ruling that the action was time-barred and the procedural defect did not justify the delay.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Articles 14 and 24 of the Constitution; The right to effective judicial protection does not extend to actions filed after the statutory limitation period has expired, nor does it remedy procedural defects in notification that do not substantively affect the outcome.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural expiration notification to prosecutor constitutional appeal statute of limitations effective judicial protection

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Articles 14 and 24 of the Constitution
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 14 y 24 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 482-1987

Fecha de resolución

13/01/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 482/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: caducidad de la acción. Copia de la resolución recaída: falta. Notificación de Sentencias: a través de Procurador. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Alberto Millán Jiménez interpone recurso de amparo contra omisión de notificación de Sentencia recaída en sumario seguido ante el Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 4 de Málaga. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 14 y 24 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00013-1987_00482.pdf