Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 1440/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:1440A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal for lack of effective judicial protection regarding administrative incompatibility rulings.

Case Number AUTO 1440/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by a lawyer against administrative and judicial rulings declaring him incompatible with the free exercise of the legal profession. The applicant argued that these decisions violated his rights to effective judicial protection, equality, and legal certainty under Articles 24, 14, 17, and 15 of the Constitution. The court rejected the claim because the challenged resolutions were judicial in nature and thus not subject to constitutional review under the specific procedural rules applicable at the time.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 14 C.E.; Art. 17.1 C.E.; Art. 15 C.E.: Judicial resolutions confirming administrative incompatibility rulings are not subject to constitutional appeal due to the lack of effective judicial protection for the specific rights invoked.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection constitutional appeal inadmissibility judicial resolution review legal profession incompatibility constitutional rights exhaustion

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 24.1, 14, 17.1 y 15 C.E.
Art. 14 C.E.
Art. 17.1 C.E.
Art. 15 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1417-1987

Fecha de resolución

23/12/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1417/198

Resumen

Inadmisión. Derechos y libertades no susceptibles de amparo: seguridad jurídica. Principio de igualdad: resoluciones judiciales. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: inadmisión de recurso de apelación. Contenido constitucional de la demanda:

carencia.

Don Enrique de No Alonso-Misol interpone recurso de amparo contra Resolución de la Subsecretaría de Trabajo sobre incompatibilidad con el ejercicio libre de la Abogacía, y Sentencias de la Sala Quinta del Tribunal Supremo y de la Sala Cuarta de lo

Contencioso-Administrativo de la Audiencia Territorial de Madrid confirmatorias de la resolución administrativa. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 24.1, 14, 17.1 y 15 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de las

Sentencias recurridas.

containers

Visualización

containers