Constitutional court dismisses appeal for lack of effective judicial protection due to missing lawyer.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to demonstrate a violation of effective judicial protection. Doña Gavina Bravo Merino requested a court-appointed lawyer to challenge a provisional dismissal order after her death prevented her from acting, but the court found no constitutional defect in the proceedings. The decision rests on the principle that the right to effective judicial protection is not violated merely by the absence of a lawyer when the underlying procedural steps were legally sound.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24 C.E.; Art. 15 C.E.: The right to effective judicial protection is not violated when a party fails to secure a court-appointed lawyer, provided the procedural steps taken by the authorities were legally valid and did not infringe upon fundamental rights.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Cuarta
Magistrados
Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 957-1987
Fecha de resolución
23/12/1987
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 957/1987
Resumen
Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: derecho no violado. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
Doña Gavina Bravo Merino solicita la designación de Abogado y Procurador del turno de oficio a fin de interponer recurso de amparo contra Auto de sobreseimiento provisional dictado por el Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 2 de Elche, en diligencias previas
incoadas por fallecimiento, y Auto de la Audiencia Provincial que ratifica aquél. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 15 y 24 C.E.
containers
Visualización
containers