Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 1416/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:1416A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to failure to exhaust judicial remedies and lack of constitutional content.

Case Number AUTO 1416/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to exhaust judicial remedies and the claim lacked constitutional content. Mutual Cyclops challenged Badajoz court rulings regarding permanent disability benefits, alleging violations of Articles 14 and 24 of the Constitution. The Court rejected the appeal as the domestic legal system provided adequate redress, rendering the constitutional complaint procedurally and substantively unfounded.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 C.E.; Art. 41 C.E.: The Constitutional Court lacks jurisdiction when the applicant has not exhausted judicial remedies or when the claim lacks constitutional content.

Keywords

AI generated
exhaustion of remedies constitutional content recurso de amparo permanent disability benefits procedural admissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 C.E.
Art. 41 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1161-1987

Fecha de resolución

21/12/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.161/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Agotamiento de recursos en la vía judicial: inexistencia. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

«Mutual Cyclops», Mutua patronal de accidentes de trabajo núm. 126, interpone recurso de amparo contra resoluciones de la Magistratura núm. 2 de Badajoz relativas al pago de cantidad por prestaciones de incapacidad permanente total. Invoca la vulneración

de los derechos consagrados en los artículos 14 y 24 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1987/1987_01416-1987_01161.pdf