Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 1405/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:1405A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal claiming unequal pay for public officials violates equality principle.

Case Number AUTO 1405/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Mercedes Palacios Sarasqueta and others against a Supreme Court ruling regarding salary disputes. The applicants argued that the differential treatment of public officials violated the constitutional principle of equality under Article 14 of the Constitution. The Court rejected the claim because the specific demands lacked the necessary constitutional content to constitute a valid violation of fundamental rights.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 14 C.E.; The Constitutional Court requires that appeals for equal pay must demonstrate a direct violation of the principle of equality, dismissing those lacking sufficient constitutional substance.

Keywords

AI generated
principle of equality public officials salaries constitutional appeal inadmissibility lack of constitutional content Article 14 Constitution

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 14 C.E.
Invocan la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 14 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Eugenio Díaz Eimil.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 966-1987

Fecha de resolución

21/12/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 966/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Principio de igualdad: retribuciones de funcionarios. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Doña Mercedes Palacios Sarasqueta y otros interponen recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Sexta del Tribunal Supremo en casacion contra la dictada por la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 3 de Navarra, en autos sobre reclamaciones de cantidad por

razones retributivas. Invocan la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 14 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1987/1987_01405-1987_00966.pdf